It need not be contended that the Gita is wavering on the point as to whom the actions are to be offered, whether to the Brahman or to the Lord Krsna. For, there is identity between the two aspects of God, the Impersonal and the Personal, though the Gita is inclined to favour the view that the Personal is more important than the Impersonal (12.5-8; 14.26-27; 15.16-18). One obvious reason for accepting this view is that there is more affinity between the Person of God and the human personality than between the Impersonal Absolute and man. This is all the more obvious in the case of a living Guru who has the human body and mind but has the divine essence in him, and who is actually seen as being moved to pity at the sight of misery and ignorance, and as becoming the saviour of men by ‘mercifully lighting the lamp of knowledge in their hearts’ (10.11). So, one can even offer all his works and the fruits thereof even to his Spiritual Teacher who, on account of his having realized God, can impart the same knowledge to his disciples. This exactly was the relation between Krsna and Arjuna; and so, just as Krsna was the embodiment of Brahman, an Avatāra, even so, any great saint like Jñāneśvara, Tukārāma, Rāmadāsa, Kabira, Jesus or Paul can be said to be the Personal aspect of God.